Unhappy employees can spread negativity like wild fire, which results in reduced productivity and lowered morale.
Have you noticed how disengaged, 
unhappy employees can spread negativity like wild fire? For some reason they are much more effective than positive focused individuals who look and sound happy and act in a compassionate manner. On a trip to A&E a year or so ago, I observed disengaged, disinterested staff who seemed to be highly procedural driven. They gave very limited eye contact – preferring their VDU – and information was very sparse. This was punctuated by one engaging, compassionate doctor who went out of her way to keep my friend, who was in acute pain (due to a dislocated wrist) informed about how and when she could expect treatment.
unhappy employees can spread negativity like wild fire? For some reason they are much more effective than positive focused individuals who look and sound happy and act in a compassionate manner. On a trip to A&E a year or so ago, I observed disengaged, disinterested staff who seemed to be highly procedural driven. They gave very limited eye contact – preferring their VDU – and information was very sparse. This was punctuated by one engaging, compassionate doctor who went out of her way to keep my friend, who was in acute pain (due to a dislocated wrist) informed about how and when she could expect treatment.One compassionate person in a workplace of 15 is not enough and the result is lowered productivity, reduced engagement, stress, absence and increased turnover. Whether public or private sector, this is not good.
Richard Barrett, a leadership consultant, who advocates a values-driven approach in organisations, looked at Fortune magazine’s annual list of the 100 Best Companies to Work For. Over a ten-year period to July 2012, he tracked the share price growth of the top 40 publicly traded companies on the list. They showed average annualised returns of 16.4 percent, compared to 4.1 percent% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 index – and they bounced back quicker from the 2008 global economic meltdown.
This suggests that there are great advantages to encouraging a positive approach to employee wellbeing, valuing compassion, strengths and ability all wrapped up in an enabling style of management.
- 6 myths about mental health and the truth behind them - 13 April 2016
- Healthy business – part two – a positive attitude - 12 February 2016
- Healthy business 2016 – let’s share ideas - 12 January 2016
- Are you flexible? - 4 November 2015
- Stress risk assessment – the helpful insight into your organisation - 20 October 2015
- Support your middle managers - 2 September 2015
- Cortisol – the stress hormone - 24 June 2015
- What is your definition of mental health? - 11 May 2015
- Mental ill health in the workplace - 13 April 2015
- Germanwings air disaster not just about one employee’s mental health - 31 March 2015
Related Posts
Exclusive video interview with Debra Corey, chief ‘pay it forward’ officer, speaker, author and ‘rebel’
Remote and flexible working can lead to burnout and promote an ‘always on’ culture
Two-fifths of UK employees at ‘breaking point’ due to stress levels
Mental wellbeing needs more support offered in the workplace say managers
Sajid Javid should scrap IR35 says IPSE
Pregnant women returning to work could receive two years protection against redundancy