The Germanwings tragedy that resulted in the death of 150 people in the French Alps has produced universal distress on many levels. The senseless slaughter of people brings the focus to the mental ill health of the pilot and much has already been written and said about this subject and recorded in the papers and news programmes.
Factually, it is important to note that it is incredibly rare for people with depression to cause death and destruction. However, this powerful condition can be extremely distressing and sometimes damaging for the individual and their family.
Most people in the workplace with this diagnosed condition manage their mental health well and the Equality Act encourages employers and colleagues to make reasonable adjustments. The phrase “there but for the grace of God go I” has never been so true or poignant as, for any of us, mood can be affected temporarily and longitudinally by genetics, our emotions, diet, lifestyle, life events and experiences.
This was a workplace disaster of the highest magnitude but there are undoubtedly many factors involved beyond just the mental health of the pilot. All airlines, particularly ‘budget’ carriers, are notoriously under massive pressures to meet their time slots, fly to full capacity and slim down all margins. Pressures like these translate from the top down as managers implement a culture of heavy performance monitoring, unrealistic targets, draconian absence management procedures, possibly implemented through an autocratic or directive style, where resilience is defined as ‘can and will do anything at any time’.
In such a culture, with even just one of these styles, would you tell your manager about your health concerns, your feelings and emotions? I am unaware if such management style exists at Germanwings or within other airlines, but I see examples of it in many organisations operating in the EU.
Naturally, there has been massive coverage of this horrendous tragedy, but focusing on the pilot’s mental health issues may lessen the emphasis on his working conditions and culture, and the interaction between them.
The workplace has to be profitable, but it also can be supportive, innovative, and flexible with policies that are enabling, not disabling. This requires management who understand how to mitigate psychosocial risk in a proactive, transparent and co-operative manner.
- 6 myths about mental health and the truth behind them - 13 April 2016
- Healthy business – part two – a positive attitude - 12 February 2016
- Healthy business 2016 – let’s share ideas - 12 January 2016
- Are you flexible? - 4 November 2015
- Stress risk assessment – the helpful insight into your organisation - 20 October 2015
- Support your middle managers - 2 September 2015
- Cortisol – the stress hormone - 24 June 2015
- What is your definition of mental health? - 11 May 2015
- Mental ill health in the workplace - 13 April 2015
- Germanwings air disaster not just about one employee’s mental health - 31 March 2015